Joomla security is strongest when you treat the CMS as a full stack: core access control, server configuration, updates, monitoring, and incident response. Joomla is still one of the most defensible open-source CMS platforms for serious sites because ACL, user groups, and many security controls live in core instead of a pile of plugins. WordPress can be secured too. It usually needs more third-party layers to reach the same baseline.
July and August 2026 proved the other half of that sentence. Popular add-ons such as JCE and SP Page Builder were the main takeover path, not Joomla’s architecture. If your site is already hacked, or you want it hardened without depending on one security extension, that is the work Infyways does: cleanup, hardening, upgrades, and ongoing maintenance.
What you will learn
- Why Joomla’s core security model still compares well with WordPress
- Why infection counts are not the same thing as “WordPress is weaker core”
- How to harden Joomla with hosting, ACL, updates, and process, not only a plugin
- What the July and August 2026 JCE, SP Page Builder, and core CVEs actually mean
- When to call for hack recovery versus a planned security upgrade
Why Joomla is still a strong security CMS versus WordPress
Joomla did not become “insecure” in 2026. The summer CVEs hit extensions that sit on top of Joomla, the same way WordPress incidents cluster in plugins and themes. The difference is how much security you get before you install anything extra.
| Security need | Joomla core | Typical WordPress setup |
|---|---|---|
| User groups and permissions | Enterprise-style ACL in core (view, create, edit, publish, admin by group) | Simple roles in core; granular ACL usually needs plugins |
| Admin vs public split | Separate /administrator application, easier to restrict by IP or VPN | Shared front/back patterns; lockdown is plugin or server work |
| Multilingual and access by language | Native multilingual plus ACL on menus and modules | Usually a plugin stack |
| Extension surface | Fewer must-have plugins for ACL, multilingual, and routing | Large plugin economy, which is also the main attack surface |
| Who gets attacked most | Smaller install base, fewer commodity mass exploits | Largest CMS share, so the default target for automated bots |
That last row needs an honest citation. In Sucuri’s 2023 Hacked Website and Malware Threat Report, WordPress accounted for 95.5% of CMS infections in their cleanup data. Joomla was 1.7%. Sucuri is clear this tracks popularity and their customer mix, not a lab score of core code. Still, the operational fact remains: WordPress is the default target. Joomla’s smaller, more ACL-heavy footprint is an advantage if you actually maintain it.
The same report found 39.1% of infected CMS apps were outdated, 49.21% had at least one backdoor, and 13.97% had a vulnerable plugin or theme at cleanup. Those numbers are the real lesson. Security is a maintenance system. Joomla gives you better native controls. It does not forgive abandoned page builders.
Secure Joomla without betting everything on one extension
A firewall or “security” extension can help. It is not a substitute for hosting, permissions, and patch discipline. This is the stack we use when a client wants the site secured, not just a new plugin invoice.
Server and PHP
- Current PHP that Joomla 5 or 6 actually supports
- TLS everywhere, SSH keys not shared passwords, isolated hosting accounts
- Disable PHP execution in
images,media, andtmp - Restrict
/administratorby IP, VPN, or HTTP auth where the business allows it
Joomla core controls
- MFA on every Super User and Manager
- Least-privilege ACL: editors should not be Super Users
- Global Configuration: strong session settings, HTTPS, sensible error reporting off on live
- Hide unused components, modules, and templates instead of leaving demo code online
Updates as a process
- Core on the current security line (Joomla 5.4.x or 6.1.x in 2026)
- Editors and page builders on a weekly check, not a yearly project
- Staging first for major upgrades, then production
- Off-site backups you have restored at least once
Infyways can run that as a one-off harden, a Joomla upgrade, or ongoing Joomla support and maintenance. If the site is already compromised, start with cleanup, then hardening. A plugin on a backdoored site only hides the problem.
July and August 2026: what actually broke
Use this section as a patch briefing, not as proof that Joomla “lost.” The pattern is familiar: commodity extensions with public endpoints, then automated scanning.
| Product | What happened | Safe version |
|---|---|---|
| JCE editor | CVE-2026-48907 unauthenticated RCE via profile import, CVSS 10.0, CISA KEV from 16 June 2026 | 2.9.99.6 or later |
| SP Page Builder | CVE-2026-48908 unauthenticated takeover (KEV), then July SQLi and mail-relay CVEs, then 12 August file-inclusion RCE | 6.8.0 (covers the full summer chain) |
| Joomla core | 12 XSS and access-control fixes on 7 July 2026 | 5.4.7 or 6.1.2 |
JCE CVE-2026-48907
JCE is a widely used editor, not Joomla core. CVE-2026-48907 let unauthenticated visitors create profiles and upload PHP. Fixed in 2.9.99.5, with 2.9.99.6 recommended. If this was unpatched on a live site, assume a backdoor until you prove otherwise.
SP Page Builder through 12 August 2026
Do not stop at 6.6.2 or 6.7.1. June’s CVE-2026-48908 was a no-login takeover. 27 July’s 6.7.1 closed unauthenticated SQL injection and a mail-relay issue documented by mySites.guru. 12 August’s 6.8.0 closed CVE-2026-67285 (PHP file inclusion) and CVE-2026-67286 (file write).
Joomla 5.4.7 and 6.1.2
The 7 July 2026 core release patched XSS and incorrect access control in media, contact, MFA, templates, installer, workflow, modules, privacy, and fields webservices. Apply it. It is still a smaller class of risk than unauthenticated editor and page-builder RCE.
If the site is already hacked
Patching a KEV-class RCE after weeks online is not a cleanup. Typical Joomla compromise leftovers are extra Super Users, PHP in tmp or image folders, modified templates, and poisoned .htaccess. Infyways handles that as incident work: isolate, take forensic copies, remove malware, rotate credentials, patch, then harden. See how we repair a hacked Joomla website if you need the recovery path.
What Infyways actually delivers
- Hacked site recovery: malware removal, backdoor hunt, Google Safe Browsing / host blacklist help
- Security hardening: server rules, ACL, MFA, admin lockdown, PHP-in-uploads blocks, backup design
- Extension and core upgrades: JCE, SP Page Builder, and Joomla 5/6 on a staging copy first
- Retainer maintenance: updates, monitoring, and a human response when the next CVE drops
We will install a reputable security extension when it fits. We will not pretend it replaces hosting controls, ACL, or a clean codebase. If you want a quote, use the contact form on this site and tell us whether you need emergency cleanup or a planned harden.
Key takeaways
- Joomla’s core ACL and admin split still give it a security architecture WordPress usually buys as plugins.
- Sucuri’s infection mix is mostly WordPress because WordPress is everywhere. Maintenance still decides who gets hacked.
- Summer 2026 takeovers were JCE and SP Page Builder. Update those, then core.
- Real Joomla security is server, ACL, updates, backups, and response, not one extension.
- Hacked sites need cleanup first. Hardening a backdoor in place fails.
Frequently asked questions
Is Joomla more secure than WordPress in 2026?
Joomla’s core ACL, separate administrator app, and smaller install base are genuine advantages. WordPress is attacked more because it is the default CMS. Either platform fails if editors, page builders, or plugins stay unpatched.
Can I secure Joomla without a third-party security extension?
Yes. Start with current PHP and Joomla, MFA, least-privilege ACL, no PHP in upload folders, restricted administrator access, backups, and a patch process. A security extension can add WAF or scanning. It should not be the only control.
What were the main Joomla security issues in July and August 2026?
JCE CVE-2026-48907 (unauthenticated RCE), SP Page Builder’s June to August chain ending in 6.8.0, and Joomla 5.4.7 / 6.1.2 core XSS and access-control fixes from 7 July 2026.
Which SP Page Builder and JCE versions should I run?
JCE 2.9.99.6 or later, and SP Page Builder 6.8.0. Older “almost patched” builds still leave summer 2026 holes open.
We were hacked. Should we migrate to WordPress?
Usually no. Migration does not remove a backdoor and it throws away Joomla ACL you already paid for. Clean the site, patch, harden, then decide. Infyways can do the recovery without forcing a CMS change.
Conclusion
Joomla remains a strong security CMS when you use the controls it already ships: ACL, a real administrator app, and a smaller, more intentional extension set. The July and August 2026 headlines were about unpatched JCE and SP Page Builder, plus a normal core security release. Keep Joomla, patch the stack, and harden the server. If you need that done as a project, from hacked-site cleanup to a maintenance retainer, Infyways is built for that work.


























